On 04/07/2011 11:57 AM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 19:19, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote:
>>
>> "libsvn_ra_serf stabilization": Ivan and others have made progress in this
>> space, and AFAIK the Serf project has made the "new public release of serf
>> which contains the fix for the massive SSL memory leak" that we call for.
>> What's left?
>>
> Memory usage of checkout/update/export is real problem in ra_serf. The
> problem comes from usage of skelta update editor mode.
>
> Lieven has some ideas how to overcome this problem [1]. While my
> personal opinion that easiest way is to implement non-skelta update
> editor mode in ra_serf (the same way as ra_neon does).
>
> [1] http://groups.google.com/group/subversion-development/browse_thread/thread/b70da726df62fa4a
>
I confess that, for reasons noted by Mark Phippard in his recent mail[1]
about ra_serf performance, I lean toward implementing the non-skelta mode.
I wouldn't even mind it if that behavior was client-side configurable, but
definitely defaulting to non-skelta.
-- C-Mike
[1] http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2011-03/0728.shtml
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-04-07 18:06:57 CEST