[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r1087131 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/cleanup.c

From: 'Daniel Shahaf' <danielsh_at_elego.de>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 12:00:40 +0200

Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 11:39:43 +0200:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:danielsh_at_elego.de]
> > Isn't this the price we pay for our design choice of single db? i.e.,
> > unless it's designly sane to ask the wq runner to run only the wq items
> > pertaining to a subtree of the working copy?
>
> For wq operations it doesn't matter whenever they run -they are all (or
> should be) 100% restartable - so you can just run these whenever you want.

I'm not concerned about the "when", I'm concerned about the case that
the wq contains work items affecting /foo/bar while I'm trying to cleanup
/foo11/bar39.
Received on 2011-03-31 12:02:05 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.