Re: svn commit: r1081892 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_io_private.h libsvn_subr/io.c libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c libsvn_wc/questions.c libsvn_wc/wc.h tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py

From: Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 09:33:42 +0000

Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> writes:

> Would I be right in guessing you made this change not from an intent to
> change the behaviour, but because you needed to re-implement part of
> 'revert' for other reasons and this behaviour was the obvious behaviour
> to implement, the old behaviour being the anomaly?

Yes, if recursive revert is a single transaction then there is no easy
way to get property changes.

-- 
Philip

Received on 2011-03-16 10:34:18 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: [PATCH] Add --dry-run flag to "svn update" client command"
Previous message: Julian Foad: "Re: [PATCH] Fix for issue 3787"
In reply to: Julian Foad: "Re: svn commit: r1081892 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion: include/private/svn_io_private.h libsvn_subr/io.c libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c libsvn_wc/questions.c libsvn_wc/wc.h tests/cmdline/revert_tests.py"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]