On 04/03/11 13:15, Philip Martin wrote:
> John Beranek <john_at_redux.org.uk> writes:
>> Oh, and my results with valgrind:
>> PASS: lt-client-test 1: test svn_client__elide_mergeinfo_catalog
>> PASS: lt-client-test 2: test svn_client_args_to_target_array
>> PASS: lt-client-test 3: test svn_client_patch
>> ==4509== Use of uninitialised value of size 8
>> ==4509== at 0x30A020F957: ??? (in /usr/lib64/libapr-1.so.0.3.9)
>> ==4509== by 0x30A020FCAE: apr_hash_set (in /usr/lib64/libapr-1.so.0.3.9)
>> ==4509== by 0x50F34C4: svn_wc__db_drop_root (wc_db_pdh.c:595)
> r1077861 I think.
Thanks, that's tidied the Valgrind output on a -O0 build, but the
assertion is still evident on a EXTRA_CFLAGS='-O2 -fno-strict-overflow'
John Beranek To generalise is to be an idiot.
http://redux.org.uk/ -- William Blake
Received on 2011-03-04 14:35:47 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev