Re: [PATCH] Remove dead code - was - Re: svn commit: r1067669
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 09:05:16AM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
> On 23.02.2011 06:47, Dongsheng Song wrote:
> Hi Donsheng,
> Thanks for your review. You are right that these two
> functions are not being used right now, but the
> integration-partial-getter and integration-is-cachable
> branches will add them to the svn_cache_t interface.
> I didn't temporarily remove the functions from the
> membuffer cache code to reduce the merge hazards
> that I already get for merging changes from the
> performance branch in a completely different order
> and granularity then that in which they got developed.
You could #if 0 them to get rid of the warnings,
and explain the situation in a comment.
Received on 2011-02-23 12:04:37 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev