On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 02:26:51PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote:
> 2011/2/16 Branko Čibej <brane_at_e-reka.si>:
> > My not very humble opinion -- we can play silly buggers trying to
> > optimize this bit of the query, but effort would be better spent in
> > merging NODES and ACTUAL_NODE, which in turn would allow us to drop the
> > second query altogether and halve the total time needed to populate the
> > cache table.
> Are you interested in doing this and just seeing if there are objections?
> You have brought it up a couple times and no one is responding. If
> you think there might be objections maybe it needs a new thread? If
> it delivers a performance win then I think we should do it. I do not
> think null column values are going to waste enough disk space to be a
Received on 2011-02-16 20:31:07 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev