Re: svn commit: r1068169 - /subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> hwright_at_apache.org wrote on Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 22:09:15 -0000:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Mon Feb  7 22:09:15 2011
>> New Revision: 1068169
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1068169&view=rev
>> Log:
>> * tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c
>>   (index_revision_adds): Update a deprecated function call, simplifying the
>>     code a bit.
>>
>> Modified:
>>     subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c
>>
>> Modified: subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c?rev=1068169&r1=1068168&r2=1068169&view=diff
>> ==============================================================================
>> --- subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c (original)
>> +++ subversion/trunk/tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c Mon Feb  7 22:09:15 2011
>> @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ index_revision_adds(int *count, svn_fs_t
>>
>>    *count = 0;
>>    SVN_ERR(svn_fs_revision_root(&root, fs, revision, pool));
>> -  SVN_ERR(svn_fs_paths_changed(&changes, root, pool));
>> +  SVN_ERR(svn_fs_paths_changed2(&changes, root, pool));
>>
>>    /* No paths changed in this revision?  Nothing to do.  */
>>    if (apr_hash_count(changes) == 0)
>> @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ index_revision_adds(int *count, svn_fs_t
>>      {
>>        const void *path;
>>        void *val;
>> -      svn_fs_path_change_t *change;
>> +      svn_fs_path_change2_t *change;
>>
>>        svn_pool_clear(subpool);
>>        apr_hash_this(hi, &path, NULL, &val);
>> @@ -96,12 +96,8 @@ index_revision_adds(int *count, svn_fs_t
>>        if ((change->change_kind == svn_fs_path_change_add)
>>            || (change->change_kind == svn_fs_path_change_replace))
>>          {
>> -          const char *copyfrom_path;
>> -          svn_revnum_t copyfrom_rev;
>> -
>> -          SVN_ERR(svn_fs_copied_from(&copyfrom_rev, &copyfrom_path,
>> -                                     root, path, subpool));
>> -          if (! (copyfrom_path && SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(copyfrom_rev)))
>> +          if (! (change->copyfrom_path
>
> The doc string for that parameter says:
>
>  /** Copyfrom revision and path; this is only valid if copyfrom_known
>   * is true. */

Since we're not actually using the copyfrom_path or copyfrom_rev, just
checking their validity, would the following patch then make sense?

[[[

Index: tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c
===================================================================
--- tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c (revision 1068475)
+++ tools/server-side/svn-populate-node-origins-index.c (working copy)
@@ -96,8 +96,7 @@
       if ((change->change_kind == svn_fs_path_change_add)
           || (change->change_kind == svn_fs_path_change_replace))
         {
- if (! (change->copyfrom_path
- && SVN_IS_VALID_REVNUM(change->copyfrom_rev)))
+ if (!change->copyfrom_known)
             {
               svn_revnum_t origin;
               SVN_ERR(svn_fs_node_origin_rev(&origin, root, path, subpool));
]]]

-Hyrum
Received on 2011-02-08 17:59:54 CET