On 23.01.2011 14:41, Lieven Govaerts wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 7:59 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
> <justin_at_erenkrantz.com <mailto:justin_at_erenkrantz.com>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Lieven Govaerts <svnlgo_at_mobsol.be
> <mailto:svnlgo_at_mobsol.be>> wrote:
> >> Greg or Lieven, any thoughts here? -- justin
> >
> > At least the one rev that fixes this issue, don't know if the
> other are
> > already working in all scenario's.
> > I'll look at it this weekend and make a release.
>
> Woohoo. Thanks. I'll be sure to test it. Let me know if you need
> any help. -- justin
>
>
> I've prepared branch 0.7.x with the changes that are safe to go in serf
> 0.7.1.
>
> I'm running some tests on Linux, Windows 7 and Mac Os X. On the latter
> svn trunk currently doesn't build for me (is_atomicity_error symbol not
> found), but doesn't seem to be related to serf.
>
> I'd appreciate some more testing, before I make the release later this
> week. The code to get is:
> http://serf.googlecode.com/svn/branches/0.7.x at r1427.
I've used a build from serf trunk for a while now without problems.
The serf log indicates that r1416 has been merged, but r1417 has not. Is
there a reason why this memory leak fix hasn't been merged to 0.7.x?
Stefan
--
___
oo // \\ "De Chelonian Mobile"
(_,\/ \_/ \ TortoiseSVN
\ \_/_\_/> The coolest Interface to (Sub)Version Control
/_/ \_\ http://tortoisesvn.net
Received on 2011-01-23 16:00:05 CET