On 01/06/2011 03:48 PM, Stefan Küng wrote:
> On 06.01.2011 21:41, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> I'm sorry if I asked this before -- I've been asking individual folks for
>> over a month now, but I can't quickly find a public broadcast thread about
>> it, at least -- but I've been wondering lately:
>>
>> What, exactly, stands in the way of us branching for 1.7 stabilization?
>>
>> ra_serf stabilization? No... that's fairly well taken care of, and would
>> fit perfectly within in the scope of post-branch work anyway.
>
> At least on Windows, I doubt that ra_serf is even used right now. Because of
> the huge memory leak serf has/had (See here:
> http://code.google.com/p/serf/source/detail?r=1416). But even though the
> leak is fixed, there hasn't been another release yet.
> With the latest release without that fix, serf is not usable at all.
> To get more people to test ra_serf, serf itself first needs a new release
> which includes that fix.
>
> Stefan
>
Xlnt feedback. I've noted this on our roadmap.html page. What else?
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on 2011-01-06 22:05:13 CET