Re: Will we release 1.5.9? (was Re: 1.5.9 up for testing/signing)

From: Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:43:58 +0000

> > 1.5.9 tarballs are up for testing and signing. [...]

I had some trouble building this but have now got the main tests

Summary:

+1 to release (Unix).

My two signatures were successfully collected by your script.

Tested:

[ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]

Environment:

OS/Platform:
Ubuntu 10.04, 2.6.32-26-generic i686 GNU/Linux

  Using in-tree build of subversion-deps-1.5.9 packages:
    apr
    apr-util
    neon
    serf
    zlib

  Using Ubuntu distribution-supplied packages:
    libdb4.8-dev 4.8
    openssl 0.9.8k-7ubuntu8.5

Results:

make check ... (8 ways): No failures.

Paranoia:

Verified that all 6 distribution packages match their md5sums,
sha1sums and to-tigris copies.

Verified that *.bz2 vs *.gz uncompress to exactly the same tarball,
for both deps and non-deps.

Signatures:

::: subversion-1.5.9.tar.bz2 :::
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk0QqiUACgkQNR8z5DU+Jbw8BACfRO8c8/skKZyzD+MpVcHXhP/A
/IgAniZLY1UvHP679sxTwCm1eUiXRAge
=1Y6A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

::: subversion-1.5.9.tar.gz :::
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk0QqiUACgkQNR8z5DU+JbxegwCeLyGv7BosyvZSWu/uodvCp3lm
eDsAn1UpsIEAKfHI2e9BwjeL2xpsbdhM
=gSqT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

- Julian
Received on 2010-12-21 14:44:38 CET