Re: svn_fs_commit_txn and svn_repos_fs_commit_txn inconsistency
From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 14:32:31 -0500
On 12/20/2010 02:14 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
That does seem reasonable, yes.
> BTW, we should have the docs for svn_fs_commit_txn mention that *new_rev is
We normally don't make that sort of doc statement. But, in a case such as
-- C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net> CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.