[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] extend svn_subst_translate_string() to record whether re-encoding and/or line ending translation were performed (v. 2)

From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2010 11:21:47 +0200

Daniel Trebbien wrote on Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 14:43:24 -0800:
> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:43 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis
> <gavinb_at_thespidernet.com> wrote:
> > Hi Daniel (T),
> >
> > Since in your earlier post you mentioned that you didn't mind a friendly reminder...
> >
> > I thought I would return this thread to the top of the list  - Just i case you had missed Daniel (Shahaf) 's comments.
> >
> >
> > Gavin "Beau" Baumanis
>
>
> Hi Gavin,
>
> I posted a new version of the patch on November 8
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123657)
> which addressed Daniel Shahaf's feedback from November 1. Daniel S.
> responded the next day with more feedback
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123719).
> I then suggested a macro solution
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123817)
> and Julian commented that a macro solution is not preferred
> (http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/123820).
>
> Julian is right that I can "feel" why not, so now I am trying to think
> of another approach to avoid the `if (translated_eol)` check from
> being executed unnecessarily. I feel stuck, though :(
>

I hope you aren't discouraged from working on the patch.

To the point, I originally asked if your changes affected the performance
of checkout/export. That is not a reason to stop the patch in its tracks;
it's a question that should be answered (either way) and the patch then
proceed. So, firstly, do your changes have any noticeable performance
effect, or is the effect of the added per-line condition simply not
noticeable?

If the latter, then I apologize (to Daniel) for your having spent time
writing patches (in various "creative" ways :)) that address what is
a non-problem.

As I don't recall (m)any other issues with the patch, I think it's
a short distance from resolving this issue to committing the patch.

>
> p.s. To avoid confusion, you can call me Danny if you would like. I
> like that name, and it comes in handy when working with other Daniels
> :)

And I'm danielsh, if it helps.

(btw, the firstnames distribution in COMMITTERS is... interesting.)
Received on 2010-11-25 10:25:11 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.