RE: svn commit: r1022931 - in /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: status.c wc-queries.sql wc_db.c wc_db.h

> >> - cold cache: 1.7 is almost 50% faster than 1.6
> >> 1.7: 22s
> >> 1.6: 42s
> >>
> >> - hot cache: 1.7 is just about on par with 1.6 (only 20% slower)
> >> 1.7: 0.86s
> >> 1.6: 0.72s
> >>
> >
> > What do you guys mean by "cold cache" and "hot cache"? If they
> mean what I think they mean, wouldn't "hot cache" be faster that
> "cold cache" ?
>
> I think they are what you think. 22 seconds is slower than < 1s,
> isn't it?
>

DOH! I missed the .86s v 22s ... it's Friday afternoon... that is my excuse.

Cheers,
BOb

Received on 2010-10-15 23:26:42 CEST