Re: [RFC] Diff (blame) optimization: how to go forward

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Johan Corveleyn <jcorvel_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> ...
>
> Just one more thing: as I mentioned in my rather long mail, blame
> would benefit the most from my optimization if the server were fast
> enough. So if anyone could spare some review cycles (ok, I know they
> are scarce these days), reviewing Stefan^2's integrate-cache-membuffer
> branch would really help my cause as well ...

Yeah, just a question of tuits. If you've reviewed the branch,
posting your conclusions here would be a great contribution. Speaking
for myself, I feel you've got more experience in some areas of that
branch than I do. :)

(Apologies if you've already done so, and I've missed it.)

-Hyrum
Received on 2010-10-08 22:36:38 CEST