[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

RE: [PATCH] Use neon's system proxy detection if not explicitly specified

From: Jon Foster <Jon.Foster_at_cabot.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:24:02 +0100

Dominique wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:19 +0100, Jon Foster wrote:
> > Better, but it'll still go wrong with Neon 0.40 or 1.00. I guess it
> > needs to be something like:
> >
> > if test -n ["`echo "$NEON_VERSION" | $EGREP
> > '^(([1-9][0-9]*)|(0\.(29|[3-9][0-9])))\.'`"] ; then
> >
> > ? That should match 0.29-0.99 and 1.0 or later. I'm assuming there
> > won't ever be a 0.100 release.
>
> As my last mail did remain unanswered and I don't want to have the
> whole thread go lost; here re-replied:
>
> The current check for 0.29/0.3x is copied from the other checks for
> NEON_0_2(<9). I think it would not be wrong to keep the checks in sync
> (or optionally even restructure this test with nested ifs).
>
> For me either way is fine: I can update the patch to also detect newer
> versions as suggest by you. Which in turn will still break all the
other
> detections of SVN_NEON_0_28 and older. Or we keep them 'in sync'
> together and fix them all together at a later stage.

This is something that the committers need to decide on.
As I'm not a committer, I won't express an opinion.

Kind regards,

Jon

**********************************************************************
This email and its attachments may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Cabot Communications Ltd.

If you are not the intended recipient of this email and its attachments, you must take no action based upon them, nor must you copy or show them to anyone.

Cabot Communications Limited
Verona House, Filwood Road, Bristol BS16 3RY, UK
+44 (0) 1179584232

Co. Registered in England number 02817269

Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.

**********************************************************************

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
Received on 2010-09-29 12:35:47 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.