Re: place of svnrdump (was: Re: svnmucc multiline property issue)
From: Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name>
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 16:40:01 +0200
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 19:15:16 +0530:
Because it lives in tools/.
> I would like to keep this
I mentioned svnmucc as a relevant example. Nobody will force you to
> I'm a just a new partial
"Your" organization? I hope that you consider yourself a part of this
> The major downside of including svnrdump now is that users might
Indeed. But it WILL get included either way --- the question is how we
> Ofcourse I understand that having authored svnrdump, it's possible
+1, let's keep this discussion professional. I'm trying to do that too
> -- Ram
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.