Lieven Govaerts wrote on Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 07:46:55 +0200:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:12 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > [ I'm only talking about the ra_serf tests in this email ]
> > When I build the atomic-revprop branch against serf r1408, I see that:
> > * diff_tests 24 29 (and many others ) fail with HEAD of the branch.
> > á á(IIRC these two failures persist if I switch to serf ^/branches/0.4.x_at_HEAD.)
> > * diff_tests 24 29 fail with r983269 reverted. (test output attached)
> In this log file, the only difference I see is that the output of
> 'iota' and 'A' are in reverse order in expected versus actual output.
How do you see "in a reverse order"? This is what I see:
DIFF STDOUT (unordered):
--- EXPECTED STDOUT
+++ ACTUAL STDOUT
@@ -1,17 +1,8 @@
---- A (revision 2)
-+++ A (revision 1)
-Property changes on: A
-## -1 +0,0 ##
--- iota (revision 2)
+++ iota (revision 1)
Property changes on: iota
which means that the entire diff for "A" has disappeared.
> Isn't this just a question of ra_serf not guaranteeing depth-first output?
No. The above paste indicates that the expected output is already
marked "unordered" and that the output for A's dirprop is missing.
Received on 2010-09-10 11:53:39 CEST