On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 10:41 AM, Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 22:51, Hyrum K. Wright
> <hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>>...
>> My one concern (and perhaps this comes from not following the
>> discussion closely enough) is how this impacts 1.7. This feels eerily
>> like an eleventh-hour redesign, and our track record with these in the
>
> Nope. This has been "on deck" for months, but just hasn't happened in
> force until now. This schema change is required to support an add
> within a copy. (along with enabling other stuff like better reverts)
Sure, but is this "bring us back to parity with 1.6" work, or is it
"new stuff we can do with wc-ng" work? If the former, it's certainly
a release blocker. If the latter, I'm not so sure....
-Hyrum
Received on 2010-09-03 17:46:02 CEST