Re: Callbacks, prompts, etc. for issue 2779

On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 16:17, Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu> wrote:
> On 30.07.2010 13:57, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 03:55 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
>>
>>> That approach just doesn't sound right to me. I've always understood
>>> that a temporary redirect implies that requests should always try the
>>> original first. Since there's no concept of a session in HTTP, you can't
>>> really assume anything about how long a redirect is valid -- it may be
>>> only for one single request and not for others.
>>>
>> What do you think Subversion should do when it encounters a temporary
>> redirect, then?
>>
> Follow the redirect but not record the new URL in the working copy metadata.
+1.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
VisualSVN Team