Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote on Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 16:58:34 +0530:
> Hi Daniel,
> Daniel Shahaf writes:
> > Please don't add "Review by" before I've actually reviewed the patch, thanks :-)
> Um, right. I guess I misunderstood you when you asked me to put the
> 'Review by' in your previous email. I'll include it while actually
> committing, but not in the email.
It's not a "in email" versus "in the commit", but rather "before I reviewed"
and "after I reviewed".
I ask you not to write "Review by: danielsh" until *after* I have reviewed the
diff (not just the idea; the actual diff). Whether it's in email or in the
physical log message is immaterial
> > Perhaps you can use one of the UnexpectedStderr classes? This has the
> > advantage that the unexpected stderr output would be printed to whomever is
> > running the test.
> Excellent suggestion! Now fixed.
> * subversino/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (run_test): Run svnrdump
> with '-q' and check that nothing is printed to stderr.
> Index: subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py
> --- subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (revision 978841)
> +++ subversion/tests/cmdline/svnrdump_tests.py (working copy)
> @@ -73,15 +73,15 @@ def run_test(sbox, dumpfile_name):
> svntest.actions.run_and_verify_load(sbox.repo_dir, svnadmin_dumpfile)
> # Create a dump file using svnrdump
> - r, svnrdump_dumpfile, err = svntest.main.run_svnrdump(sbox.repo_url)
> + r, svnrdump_dumpfile, err = svntest.main.run_svnrdump('-q', sbox.repo_url)
> # Check error code
> if (r != 0):
> raise svntest.Failure('Result code not 0')
> # Check the output from stderr
> - if not err.startswith('* Dumped revision'):
> - raise svntest.Failure('No valid output')
> + if err:
> + raise SVNUnexpectedStderr(err)
> # Compare the output from stdout
Received on 2010-07-24 13:38:53 CEST