Re: svn commit: r964704 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc_db.c

Yes, svn_sqlite__update() *does* reset the statement before returning
(it isn't something where you can iterate over results; it is done; so
it resets the statement).

Thus, the extra reset should not be there. "Following the pattern"
isn't right here.

On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 13:44, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl> writes:
>
>> Doesn't _update handle this specific reset? If not I think it should.
>
> The compiler was complaing about a missing argument to
> svn_error_createf.  I was just following the pattern used by next
> function.
>
>>    if (affected_rows != 1)
>>      return svn_error_createf(SVN_ERR_WC_PATH_NOT_FOUND,
>> +                             svn_sqlite__reset(stmt),
>>                               _("The node '%s' was not found."),
>>                               svn_dirent_local_style(local_abspath,
>>                                                      scratch_pool));
>
> --
> Philip
>
Received on 2010-07-16 20:21:13 CEST