----- Original Nachricht ----
Von: Bert Huijben <bert_at_qqmail.nl>
An: szukw000_at_arcor.de, dev_at_subversion.apache.org
Datum: 28.06.2010 09:58
Betreff: RE: subversion-1.6.12, apache-2.3.6
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: szukw000_at_arcor.de [mailto:szukw000_at_arcor.de]
> > Sent: maandag 28 juni 2010 9:51
> > To: dev_at_subversion.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: subversion-1.6.12, apache-2.3.6
> > I know that httpd-2.3.x is alpha. Second trial for the patch.
> Thanks for your patch, it came through this time.
> To apply the patch to trunk we need code that works on older and newer
> versions of httpd (E.g. including proper checking for which version is
> I assume you know more about how we should check for specific httpd
> versions than we do as you are testing httpd alpha's.
> Another way to get a patch to be applied sooner, is writing a log message
> our preferred format:
> ges for details.
I am a simple user only. So perhaps I misunderstand you.
#define AP_SERVER_MAJORVERSION_NUMBER 2
#define AP_SERVER_MINORVERSION_NUMBER 3
#define AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL_NUMBER 6
#define AP_SERVER_DEVBUILD_BOOLEAN 0
The last file
has changed with 'AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL_NUMBER 6', where the
APLOG_MARK has changed.
The other changes I found in 'AP_SERVER_PATCHLEVEL_NUMBER 5',
So one has to test MINOR and PATCH. Bad.
When I found subversion-1.6.12, I thought there would have been an
adaption to httpd-2.3.x .
And I thought that the httpd-team and the subversion-team were working
together. But it seems that the httpd-team makes changes without informing
other teams. Worse.
WM 2010: Top News, Spielpläne, Public Viewing-Termine, E-Cards und alles,
was der Fan sonst noch braucht, gibt´s im Sport-Channel auf arcor.de.
Received on 2010-06-28 11:05:00 CEST