C. Michael Pilato wrote on Fri, 18 Jun 2010 at 22:02 -0000:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > You mean, to extend the dav_db structure to hold that information? If
> > that's possible, I suppose the only candidate for filling in that
> > information is db_open(), who can examine its dav_resource object. But
> > does the dav_resource object contain the needed information? Or do we
> > need the request_rec object for that?
>
> Hrm, come to think of it, this might be something that isn't easy to do by
> merely extending the PROPPATCH request. mod_dav may simply not give us
> enough information. Is this something we need to employ HTTPv2 for? (I
> truly don't know at this point.)
Update: after talking to Greg and Mike on IRC, the current plan is to
use db_store()'s ELEM parameter to access the PROPPATCH XML document
tree, before trying other approaches (HTTPv2, POST, etc).
Received on 2010-06-24 13:16:30 CEST