Re: wc-ng base/working nodes in a copied tree
From: Greg Stein <gstein_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 15:50:38 -0400
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 07:09, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
That's my suggestion, yes. I believe that behavior is a bug. Consider
Hmm. But I guess the operation is "set up the local wc so that, when I
Okay. So I guess we continue to mark that as sched-delete.
> If we mark the node excluded do we use some additional mark to
To delete a node, it needs to be present in the working copy. ie. depth=empty.
But never mind this particular scenario.
Now back to the prior messages...
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.