[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.10 up for testing/signing - merge tests failing

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2010 12:56:46 -0400

Paul Burba wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:52 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 8:08 AM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 11:43 +0100, Julian Foad wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 2010-03-31 at 13:01 -0600, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>>>> 1.6.10 tarballs are up, the magic revision is r929659:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.10/
>>>>> For me, merge_tests.py 45 77 79 124 126 all fail, on serf/fsfs.
>>>> If I roll the 1.6.x branch back to r929629, it passes.
>>> Hi Julian,
>>>
>>> Doesn't really help you, but those all pass for me:
>>>
>>> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline>python
>>> C:\SVN\src-branch-1.6.x\subversion\tests\cmdline\merge_tests.py 45 77
>>> 79 124 126 --http-library serf --cleanup
>>> PASS: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
>>> PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
>>> PASS: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
>>> PASS: merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path
>>> PASS: merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo
>> My bad, I didn't pass --url! I was still half asleep when I did that.
>> The tests pass for me over ra_neon, but all except 77 fail over
>> ra_serf.
>
> All 5 corresponding tests (45, 76, 78, 123, 125 for those playing at
> home) pass on trunk [fsfs | ra_serf]
>
> Paul

I'm seeing what Paul's seeing:

OVER NEON:

PASS: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
PASS: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
PASS: merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path
PASS: merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo

OVER SERF:

FAIL: merge_tests.py 45: target inherits mergeinfo from nearest ancestor
PASS: merge_tests.py 77: subtrees added after start of merge range are ok
FAIL: merge_tests.py 79: merge --reintegrate with renamed file on branch
FAIL: merge_tests.py 124: no self referential filtering on added path
FAIL: merge_tests.py 126: merge --reintegrate with subtree mergeinfo

Man, as many times as I ran the test suite for those stupid issue #3242
backports this is really, really surprising. But I can verify that if I run
the tests right now on the backport branch, they fail in the same way. I'll
dive in after lunch and see if I can figure out why we (once again) have
disparity in our supposedly interchangeable WebDAV RA providers.

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on 2010-04-02 18:57:16 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.