Re: svn commit: r919460 - filtering svn patch targets
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 03:11:06AM +0100, Neels J Hofmeyr wrote:
> > So anything it does with patches should be done by
> > svn. In effect, whatever Tortoise wants to do with a patch has to be
> > implemented in svn, taking away dev time from wc-ng, pristine store and <add
> > cool features>.
> So svn patch is not a <cool feature>?
Neither of us meant that. Patch is a good thing to be doing, too.
> I want to see the basics of the 'svn patch' feature through to completion
> for 1.7. We have enough features that were released in a half-baked state.
> > The real question is: how much effort shall we invest at this point into
> > selectively applying patches? Can it wait for a later release? Can someone
> > who really needs it implement it?
> Nobody can implement anything before discussing what needs to be
> implemented (which is what this thread is about).
Received on 2010-03-12 13:37:44 CET
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev