Re: wc-ng question -- is this an optimization?

From: Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:54:59 +0100

On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 09:08:53PM -0500, Greg Stein wrote:
> (tho, honestly, ref: read_kind, I'm still a bit queasy with it
> returning node_unknown, but we can eval that later)

node_unkown has already spilled into libsvn_client/patch.c

> On the larger topic of passing-params-via-struct... I am a firm
> believer against that.

> If somebody wants to nuke that
> "pattern" of coding, then I will personaly buy you several beers (or
> some alternative drink of your choice).

Stout would do :)

Stefan
Received on 2010-02-22 08:56:16 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Philip Martin: "Re: memory leak? ref: merge test 4"
Previous message: Stefan Sperling: "Re: WC-NG - on detachable WCs and pristine store options"
In reply to: Greg Stein: "Re: wc-ng question -- is this an optimization?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]