Awesome work! We've just been assuming/hoping it would be fast enough,
and would resolve any problems "later". It is good to see we're in the
right ballpark.
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 13:21, Philip Martin <philip.martin_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> How fast are sqlite queries be compared to the old-wc entry caching?
> Operations like update benefit from faster locking, but in old-wc
> status does no locking at all. Also the multiple entries files give
> the data a tree-like organisation that is not modelled quite so well
> by an SQL table. Is sqlite going to be at least as fast as old-wc at
> running status when the OS cache is hot? I've been vaguely assumming
> that it would be OK but this week I felt it was time to investigate.
> What would we do in 3 months time if wc-ng turns out to be an order of
> magnitude slower than old-wc?
>...
Received on 2010-02-18 22:31:59 CET