Re: [RFC] Comments on wc-metadata.sql PRISTINE and

WORKING_NODE rows exist for *all* affected nodes.

ACTUAL_NODE rows may exist w/o a corresponding WORKING_NODE row (in
which case, there better be a BASE_NODE row).

In the comments, we should be better about stating null rather than
NULL (as the latter indicates a NULL pointer, not the SQL null value).

moved_here is 1 or something else. There is no need to have a tri-state.

Your comment with respect to moved_to is incomplete. There are more
possible states than just 'base-deleted' and 'normal'. You could also
have (at least) 'not-present' on a child. Consider the sequence: MOVE
A to B. COPY C to A. DELETE A/D. The A/D child will be not-present.

Cheers,
-g

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 13:38, Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com> wrote:
> Hey WC-NG folks, please tell me what's right/wrong/unsure in the
> additions and changes below. Feel free to commit any parts that are
> right: I'm not yet familiar enough to really be comfortable committing
> it myself but I will if you want.
>
> - Julian
>
>
Received on 2010-02-17 19:51:54 CET