Re: [PATCH] fsfs: pack revs without packing revprops, or vice-versa

From: Julian Foad <julian.foad_at_wandisco.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:01:09 +0000

Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Since the fsfs logics of rev-packing and revprop-packing are entirely
> separate (e.g., min-unpacked-rev and min-unpacked-revprop are separate),
> one could reasonably want to enable one without enabling the other.

Why?

As a developer, for testing etc., sure - but in real life?

- Julian
Received on 2010-02-09 18:01:50 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Julian Foad: "Re: Re-use connection for svn:externals"
Previous message: Karen Tracey: "Re: new website & IRC bot"
In reply to: Daniel Shahaf: "[PATCH] fsfs: pack revs without packing revprops, or vice-versa"
Next in thread: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [PATCH] fsfs: pack revs without packing revprops, or vice-versa"
Reply: Daniel Shahaf: "Re: [PATCH] fsfs: pack revs without packing revprops, or vice-versa"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]