Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for February 2010 ("Subversion Developers" <dev@subversion.apache.org>)

On Feb 2, 2010, at 10:01 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Bert Huijben <bert_at_vmoo.com> wrote:
>> Should we hold the graduation process on the javahl api changes, or
>> can we
>> just continue that?
>>
>> I would guess that we should have it fixed before release, but that
>> it
>> doesn't hold the graduation...?
>
> I do not see a need to hold graduation until this is fixed in trunk
> (or a release).
>
> As Greg has pointed out before, the key bit - from the Incubator and
> Board levels - is that there is appropriate oversight being performed
> by the appropriate people. With those hats on, I'm very very
> comfortable that is the case. -- justin

The subversion project has shown that it gets the Apache way. Voting
new committers, voting releases, etc.

There's adequate oversight by folks who know how things are supposed
to work.

If the project promises to fix the Java package names by a release
certain (not some arbitrary sometime in future), I'm satisfied.

Craig

Craig L Russell
Assistant Secretary, Apache Software Foundation
Chair, OpenJPA PMC
clr@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo
Received on 2010-02-02 19:09:37 CET