Re: Obliterate - milestone 1 reached: the most basic obliteration

On Thu, 2010-01-28, Julian Foad wrote:
> Please take a look at the differences between these three files if you
> will. I think they show two things.
>
> (1) They show that the 'copies' information in the 'transactions' table
> is not properly updated: the transaction still thinks it has a node that
> is a copy (node-rev 'i.1.f' copied from '/f-mov/E_at_9'), but in fact that
> node-rev was obliterated and so the copy information should be deleted
> too.

I fixed (1) in r905283.

- Julian
Received on 2010-02-01 14:55:48 CET