Philip Martin wrote:
> Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> writes:
>
>> So shouldn't the mergeinfo on this path in the old repos,
>>
>>
>>> svn pg svn:mergeinfo https://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/branches/1.6.x-r40452/CHANGES@40513
>>>
>> ...
>> /trunk/CHANGES:2-1281,35888-40052,40088,40152,40451-40452
>>
>> differ from from the new repos,
>>
>>
>>> svn pg svn:mergeinfo https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r40452/CHANGES@880587
>>>
>> ...
>> subversion/trunk/CHANGES:836421-837700,872307-876471,876507,876571,880525-880526
>>
>> only by the offset? The fact that it doesn't is troubling, to say the
>> least, and might also explain why you got different results with the
>> old repos.
>>
>
> Yes, I think you are right and I don't understand it.
>
I find this quite disturbing ... although it has no direct bearing on
whether the merge bug is a new bug or not, we should still figure out
how this mergeinfo got out of sync.
(BTW, all the above pretty much convinced me that this merge failure
indeed is not a new bug.)
-- Brane
Received on 2009-12-18 23:01:55 CET