On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Hyrum K. Wright
<hyrum_wright_at_mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
>
> On Dec 2, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> Hi all.
>>
>> Gather up your holiday cheer, for I would like to propose a gift to the Subversion user community: Subversion 1.6.7. I know that folks have been busy with the ASF transition as of late, but our users have been busy finding bugs and STATUS is getting pretty full. As a result, I'd like to roll 1.6.7 on Wed., Dec. 16.
>>
>> Remember, 'tis better to give than receive, so please give the gift of review time and votes to worthy items in STATUS.
>
> Nudge, nudge...
>
> 1.6.7 is still rolling on Dec. 14, only 2 days away. Get your votes in now!
>
> -Hyrum
For those who missed it on IRC, 1.6.7 is on hold.
Hyrum ran into a problem when reintegrating a branch back to 1.6.x
using the (at the time) latest 1.6.x client. Here is the merge he did
(though this has a pegged source because the backport branch was
deleted):
1.6.x.>svn merge ^^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-r40452_at_891008 . --reintegrate
..\..\..\subversion\libsvn_ra_neon\util.c:546: (apr_err=160013)
svn: '/repos/asf/!svn/bc/875961/subversion/branches/1.6.x' path not found
Unfortunately this reintegrate works with 1.6.6, so we have a regression.
I've traced the cause to r890993 (Reintegrate the 1.6.x-r889840
branch) which was my attempt to address the myriad of problems caused
by issue #3547 http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3547,
which converted all the mergeinfo in our repository from absolute to
relative merge source paths when we loaded it into the ASF repos. I
haven't been able to fix the reintegrate problem Hyrum encountered,
heck it's not exactly clear to me what is going wrong, but I'm working
on it.
Paul
Received on 2009-12-16 23:39:14 CET