On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> What about running the two lists in parallel for a couple of weeks,
> and adding a notice to the footer indicating that users_at_s.t.o will
> disappear on a given day? I don't like the long-term idea of having
> to subscribe and monitor Yet Another List, but doing so in the short
> term to get people to migrate sounds reasonable.
People often move mailing lists without forcing users to
unsubscribe/resubscribe, and without fracturing into disjoint old and
new lists. I am astonished that the subversion community is even
considering fracturing the lists.
I am sure you can figure out the technical details of how to do it, but
from a user perspective, I want:
* At least 7 days' notice of what the changes will be, so I can adjust
my email filters, aliases, bookmarks, expectations.
* I stay subscribed to the list, but I notice that messages have
different headers indicating that the list has moved.
* subscribe or help messages, or attempts at posting, when sent to the
old addresses, either return a useful error message referring to the
new procedure, or simply forward to the new addresses.
* new archive contains both old and new messages.
* old archive URLs to continue to work for a long time (at least
for old messages but not necessarily for new messages), possibly
via HTTP redirects to a new archive location.
--apb (Alan Barrett)
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2416425
Received on 2009-11-11 09:47:47 CET