"Skip" the patching of that file.
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 14:42, Stefan Sperling <stsp_at_elego.de> wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Fri Sep 18 11:42:30 2009
> New Revision: 39440
>
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c
> (apply_one_patch): Ooops, don't MALFUNCTION() on unversioned obstructions.
>
> Modified:
> trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c
>
> Modified: trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c?pathrev=39440&r1=39439&r2=39440
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c Fri Sep 18 11:16:11 2009 (r39439)
> +++ trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/patch.c Fri Sep 18 11:42:30 2009 (r39440)
> @@ -974,6 +974,9 @@ apply_one_patch(svn_patch_t *patch, cons
> target->conflicted = TRUE;
> break;
> case svn_wc_merge_no_merge:
> + /* Unversioned obstruction.
> + * ### Should we patch them or leave them alone? */
> + break;
> default:
> SVN_ERR_MALFUNCTION();
> }
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=495&dsMessageId=2396576
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2396589
Received on 2009-09-18 21:22:36 CEST