[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Remove entries cache in adm_access

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 15:28:06 +0100

"Hyrum K. Wright" <hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> writes:

> As for API consumers which are using entries and now have sub-optimal
> memory consumption, I say "tough rocks, upgrade to the new APIs".
> That might be harsh, but I think it's the reality as keeping the cache
> in sync is much more trouble than it's worth.

How bad is "sub-optimal"? If it's anything like the pre-1.0 clients
before entries caching then it's not just sub-optimal is unusable on
large working copies. I don't think "upgrade to the new APIs" is
compatible with our versioning goals. Our stated policy
has always been that old APIs will continue to work. If you want
to write 2.0 you don't get to call it 1.7.

Received on 2009-07-31 16:28:43 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.