[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn commit: r38268 - in trunk: tools/dev www www/images

From: Ivan Zhakov <ivan_at_visualsvn.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:55:48 +0400

On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Hyrum K. Wright<hyrum_at_hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
>
>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>>> New Revision: 38268
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Update the dav server survey for July 2009.
>>>
>>> * www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html,
>>>  www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png,
>>>  tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py:
>>>  Update image and table.
>>>
>>> Modified:
>>>   trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>>>   trunk/www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png
>>>   trunk/www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html
>>>
>>> Modified: trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>>> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py?pathrev=38268&r1=38267&r2=38268
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =
>>> =====================================================================
>>> --- trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py     Tue Jun 30 07:10:17 2009
>>> (r38267)
>>> +++ trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py     Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>>> (r38268)
>>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ STATS = [
>>>   ('4/1/2009', 408658),
>>>   ('5/1/2009', 407044),
>>>   ('6/1/2009', 406520),
>>> +  ('7/1/2009', 334276),
>>
>> Ouch.  Any idea what happened here?
>
> Not really.  These are the numbers I got from SecuritySpace:
>
> Date                Count   % Share   %Growth
> ==============  ========= ===================
> Jun 2009           334276      1.23    -21.37
> May 2009           406520      1.56      1.00
> Apr 2009           407044      1.55      2.03
> Mar 2009           408658      1.52      3.42
> Feb 2009           390502      1.47      3.47
> ...
>
> I seriously doubt that 1 in 5 public Subversion servers went dark in
> one month.  I guess it was something to do with their research
> methodology, but there's no way to be sure.
>
Many customers of VisualSVN Server asked to remove information about
Apache version and loaded modules from server response. Probably
people also do this of their custom Apache/Subversion servers.

-- 
Ivan Zhakov
VisualSVN Team
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2366826
Received on 2009-06-30 21:56:06 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.