On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:45 PM, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>> New Revision: 38268
>>
>> Log:
>> Update the dav server survey for July 2009.
>>
>> * www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html,
>> www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png,
>> tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py:
>> Update image and table.
>>
>> Modified:
>> trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>> trunk/www/images/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.png
>> trunk/www/svn-dav-securityspace-survey.html
>>
>> Modified: trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py
>> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py?pathrev=38268&r1=38267&r2=38268
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =
>> =====================================================================
>> --- trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py Tue Jun 30 07:10:17 2009
>> (r38267)
>> +++ trunk/tools/dev/graph-dav-servers.py Tue Jun 30 09:21:30 2009
>> (r38268)
>> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ STATS = [
>> ('4/1/2009', 408658),
>> ('5/1/2009', 407044),
>> ('6/1/2009', 406520),
>> + ('7/1/2009', 334276),
>
> Ouch. Any idea what happened here?
Not really. These are the numbers I got from SecuritySpace:
Date Count % Share %Growth
============== ========= ===================
Jun 2009 334276 1.23 -21.37
May 2009 406520 1.56 1.00
Apr 2009 407044 1.55 2.03
Mar 2009 408658 1.52 3.42
Feb 2009 390502 1.47 3.47
...
I seriously doubt that 1 in 5 public Subversion servers went dark in
one month. I guess it was something to do with their research
methodology, but there's no way to be sure.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2366811
Received on 2009-06-30 20:54:01 CEST