Re: editor v2 and replace

On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 06:29:13PM +0200, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hmm. I figured that with the "add follows" flag, then you could know
> to avoid dual-notifications, and just wait for the add. But yah...
> then you'd need to remember (at add time) that a delete had happened.
> More cross-call state.
>
> Adding a flag to the add calls should work. Tho I hate the "replace"
> terminology. Maybe "overwrite=TRUE" is better? (and, of course,
> failure if you're trying to overwrite, and nothing is there)
>
> Bikeshed. But yah. Extending the add calls sounds better. Thanks!

I'd like to point that I'd also like an atomic editor
call for move(), please!

Can we do that?

Stefan
Received on 2009-06-11 18:45:25 CEST