Stefan Küng wrote:
> On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:22, Stefan Küng <tortoisesvn_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> In the file libsvn_wc/adm_ops.c, function
>> svn_wc_remove_from_revision_control(), line 2628:
>>
>> dir_entry = apr_hash_get(parent_entries, base_name,
>> APR_HASH_KEY_STRING);
>> if (dir_entry->depth != svn_depth_exclude)
>> {
>> svn_wc__entry_remove(parent_entries, base_name);
>> SVN_ERR(svn_wc__entries_write(parent_entries, parent_access, pool));
>>
>> }
>>
>> the 'dir_entry' is NULL, and accessing it in the if-clause causes a
>> segfault.
>> From the crash dump I got, I can't see anything special about the path
>> (it was F:\dev\svn\name\name), so no root path, no UNC path or anything
>> else special I can think of.
>>
>> But the delete was called with --keep-local, so maybe that has something
>> to do with it?
>
> Some more information:
> the folder which should be deleted is tree-conflicted (deleted in
> repository, still present locally).
>
> Stefan
Actually, are you saying that when you got the error, some folder was
already tree-conflicted, or are you saying that deleting with --keep-local
per se results in a tree-conflicted situation?
The latter results in an obstructed path, as I pointed out just now in a
different mail, just a "potential tree-conflict", nothing to worry about.
If it's the former, could you please clarify? Maybe it's worth
investigating, TC wise. But so far I'd guess it's not related.
~Neels
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2358945
Received on 2009-06-03 02:37:23 CEST