[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Memory leak with 1.6.x clients

From: <kmradke_at_rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:28:17 -0500

"C. Michael Pilato" <cmpilato_at_collab.net> wrote on 05/29/2009 02:12:25 PM:
> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Paul Burba <ptburba_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This makes the commit I/O bound and slows it down quite a bit -- the
> >> total number of failed attempts being ((N(N+1)/2)-1) -- I'll look
into
> >> speeding this up...
> >
> > This sounds horrid. I think we've had reports about commit being much
> > slower in 1.6 too. And getting slower as the number of files goes up.
> >
> > Is this fixable?
>
> We could use tempfile names that match the name of the to-be-committed
file,
> instead of having them all be generic tempfile.N type names. That would
> reduce name clashes.

Do we already have a hash value for the file? Could we just stringify
it? That would make it even less likely to clash, right?

Kevin R.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2356935
Received on 2009-05-29 21:28:09 CEST

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.