Sure, but we're going to release 1.7 at some point. If the 1.6 code
doesn't like newer formats, then we should know that *now*. Try and
get a fix into 1.6 so that it will gracefully bail out.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 23:03, Daniel Shahaf <d.s_at_daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote on Tue, 5 May 2009 at 10:53 -0500:
>> I'm planning on rolling 1.6.2 tomorrow, late afternoon CDT. A couple
>> of items of interest:
>> * Daniel reported a segfault in 1.6.1 which I don't know has been
>> addressed
>
> (thanks! *I* forgot about it)
>
> Which? If it's the "'svn1.6.1 up format-11-wc' blows up" that I reported
> (twice) on IRC, I don't know whether it's possible to reproduce it without
> involving format>10 (i.e., dev format) wc's.
>
> Daniel
>
>> * STATUS could use more review and votes
>> * Paul still has a few merge-related fixes he'd like to nominate
>>
>> I'm not currently inclined to hold the release for the above issues,
>> unless people can present a case to do so. (But I'm a pretty easy
>> push-over, so don't sweat it too much. :) )
>>
>> -Hyrum
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------
>> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2070488
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100526
>
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2100965
Received on 2009-05-07 23:42:38 CEST