Re: [Second Request] Re: Stale logs and upgrading to WC-NG

Greg Stein wrote:
> On another note, elsewhere in this thread was a call for "maybe use
> something other than 'svn cleanup'?" ... When Hyrum and I suggested
> that command, it was in terms of "clean up your wc, to be usable by
> 1.7 [and yah... it upgrades it]." But in the past day, I believe we
> are going to continue to need the historical concept of "cleanup",
> even in the wc-ng world. To that end, I would propose a --upgrade
> switch to cleanup, rather than a new 'upgrade' subcommand.

There is a certain pleasant parallel between 'svnadmin upgrade' for
repositories and 'svn upgrade' (as opposed to 'svn cleanup --upgrade') for
working copies. No strong opinion on the matter, though. At least, not
today. ;-)

-- 
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2056934