On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:31, Edmund Wong <ed_at_kdtc.net> wrote:
> Edmund Wong wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A quick "nitpick" patch, if I may?
>>
>
> Regarding this 'typo' patch, while reading svn_wc.h (it
> is a big one. Well, then there's svn_client.h which
> is equally big, but I digress), I noticed something
> like the following (I asked this on IRC but got no
> response):
In IRC? I didn't see any query about this. Are you in #svn-dev on freenode?
(#svn is the users channel; you wouldn't get a response about this in
that channel...)
>
> subversion/include/svn_wc.h:
> docstring for svn_wc_conflict_description_create_tree:
>
> /**
> * Allocate an @c svn_wc_conflict_description_t structure
>
> Shouldn't it be an "a" instead of an "an"?
>
> Insignificant I must admit. But a grasshopper like I,
> would like to know if changes like this would be
> a bit anal retentive when I should be concentrating on
> the code itself?
I think it is just fine to make changes like that.
Our revision numbers are unlimited. There is no reason to conserve
them. So if we blow through a few hundred making one-character
changes... I'm cool with that.
Cheers,
-g
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1765487
Received on 2009-04-17 12:48:50 CEST