Re: 1.6 svn: prop eol-style strictness: breaking svnsync and subclipse

B Smith-Mannschott wrote on Mon, 6 Apr 2009 at 13:43 +0200:
> > Is there anything left to be done here, or do these workarounds close the
> > issue for you?
>
> Yes, I can manage with the identified workarounds and patches, however:
>
> I don't like relying on an out-of-tree patch on svnsync (even if I
> wrote it myself). IMO, it would be better if Subversion itself
> incorporated a fix to address this issue. I still see this as a
> symptom of a design/implementation oversight in 1.6. This should be
> addressed, and not left to fester.
>

I tend to agree. (I asked because I didn't know whether you thought the
last workaround you found obsoleted the need for the patch.) I'll test
and commit your (last) patch later, then.

Thanks for taking care of this issue.

Daniel
(author of r36106)

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1564149
Received on 2009-04-06 20:42:31 CEST