-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Thanks Stefan and Hyrum.
Committed in r36851 and nominated for 1.6.x backport.
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 09:28:33AM -0500, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 9:26 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>> Do we support upgrade version-hopping like this? I was under the
>>>> impression that to upgrade from 1.X to 1.X+2, you'd better go through
>>> What if somebody is *not* interested in 1.X and continue using old
>>> and suddenly needs 1.X+1 badly, so why not he upgrade directly?
>>> In any case atleast we should detect leap upgrades and take meaningful
>>> upgrade path or atleast suggest something useful instead of vague
>> Sure. I'm not saying we shouldn't support it, I'm just that I didn't
>> know we currently do support that upgrade path. (And if somebody
>> really did want to jump several repository formats ahead, they are
>> probably better off doing a dump/load.)
> It's a regression either way because it worked with 1.5.x.
> I'd say we should fix the bug, whether or not we support such
> an upgrade. It's an easy fix.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on 2009-03-30 16:50:47 CEST