[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.6.0 up for testing/signing

From: Kamesh Jayachandran <kamesh_at_collab.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:55:12 +0530

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I tested the following,

[ra_local, ra_svn, ra_neon, ra_serf] * [fsfs, bdb]

All tests PASS.

+1 to release.

With regards
Kamesh Jayachandran

Signature on subversion-1.6.0.tar.bz2

- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBJw5hC3WHvyO0YTCwRAnZMAKC2Nsl8Lfy7GuUfF/54qO9YwLUUeQCgm4Gi
OHDYX14C2kIfhT4VFHIooIo=
=tv0I
- -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> I'm pleased to announce that Subversion 1.6.0 "Hammerhead" is up for
> testing and
> signing. The magic revision is r36650. You can find the tarballs here:
>
> http://orac.ece.utexas.edu/pub/svn/1.6.0/
>
> This is the proposed final tarball for 1.6.0, and has been created
> from the same magic revision as 1.6.0-rc4. If you tested and signed
> that tarball, and are comfortable with doing so, you may examine the
> diff between 1.6.0 and 1.6.0-rc4 to ensure I didn't do anything
> nefarious, and sign the new tarball without testing. I'm shooting for
> a morning release tomorrow, so please attempt to sign expeditiously.
>
> [Oh, and PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE THE RELEASE NOTES while you're at it.]
>
> You know the drill: signatures from full committers back to me, and
> enthusiastic tester feedback is welcome. At this point, this
> candidate is not yet blessed for wide release, so please don't make it
> available to people not interested in test-driving the new release.
>
> Distro package maintainers, please do NOT include any pre-release
> builds, even blessed, into operating system distros. The reasons for
> not doing so were very eloquently outlined by Karl in a mail, which is
> summarized at the above address.
>
> The quick version is: we don't guarantee compatibility between the pre-
> releases and the final release, so if people install the release
> candidate, all their repositories and working copies might break
> irreparably when they upgrade to 1.6.0 proper. We don't want that
> kind of bad publicity, and neither do you.
>
> -Hyrum
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1357479
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJw5k43WHvyO0YTCwRAhipAKCCEypLCt7uGr+7wk1PF6lSNBHgXACgtKHx
6+0oKpe3XYss8zt2i2mwsj4=
=f+5n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1364436
Received on 2009-03-20 14:24:23 CET

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.