CHANGEs File for Subversion 1.6 - Questions - #3349

Hi,

I found the following:

In theory, BDB backend could allow `changes' table out-of-sync with
actual changes (#3349)

A comment in the #3349 issue:
-------------
NOTE: The API usage demonstrated in the regression test is not valid
per the instructions on the APIs given in svn_fs.h, which say that you
must send windows including the NULL terminating window through the
returned handlers before making other changes to the transaction. FSFS
seems to enforce this, but BDB does not. In BDB, this code path will
result in node revisions that still have dangling
representations-in-progress, but that was true before my changes, too.
-------------

Based on the diff
   svn diff -r 34896:34897 http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn
i don't see a real change in an API ?

Or did i misunderstand a thing ?

Kind regards
Karl Heinz Marbaise

-- 
SoftwareEntwicklung Beratung Schulung    Tel.: +49 (0) 2405 / 415 893
Dipl.Ing.(FH) Karl Heinz Marbaise        ICQ#: 135949029
Hauptstrasse 177                         USt.IdNr: DE191347579
52146 Würselen                           http://www.soebes.de
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=1334489