Re: [PATCH] Redesign of functional specification for obliterate (Reposting extended patch)

On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 06:27:57PM -0500, Magnus Torfason wrote:
> What would be the process for getting this kind of
> patch committed into the repo? Votes, comments, consensus?

There is no formal process as such.

Your earlier posts about obliterate have received lots of comments,
so it's reasonable to assume that this patch will trigger some further
discussion.

I'd say we'll wait a while for some comments, and if the general vibe
during the discussion is positive, we'll commit this update to the spec.
If no comments arrive, we'll see what we can do about that.

While I myself have not yet concerned myself enough with "obliterate"
to be able to provide useful comments, I am glad to see you trying
to push this long-standing issue forward and would hate to see this
contribution end up being dropped.

Stefan
Received on 2009-03-04 21:57:23 CET